8834 E 34 Rd Suite #131 25053 , Cadillac, MI 49601
(231) 577-6899‬

Winning By Default. Why Billionaires Fund Socialist/Marxist Agenda

Does anyone ever wonder why billionaires who made their fortunes via some of the most cut throat capitalistic manuevers in history fund and throw their names behind the indoctrination of America's youth by the Modern Liberal Socialist/Marxist Movement? Did all of their amassed wealth and power suddenly enlighten them to the needs of the masses, and the evils of capitalism? Are they now paying penance for their sins in hopes of forgiveness?

The answer to the last two questions is a very simple one: NO. They neither feel any remorse for what they have done to accumulate their wealth, nor have any interest in that wealth shrinking. This leads us to the answer for the first question: They are funding this agenda because the agenda does not only pose no risk to their wealth, but rather will act as the greatest protector of their wealth.

Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos were not born rich. They each came from rather ordinary backgrounds. What sets them apart is that each of them was able to turn an idea into a bohemoth corporation that created tremendous wealth for themselves and others. They relentlessly competed with others until they came out on top, amassing great fortunes and the power that comes with them.

These are not stupid men. They know that there are many future and potential Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerbergs and Jeff Bezos out there, and that their ideas have the potential to rival or even replace theirs. Competition is out there and old lions DO NOT want to fight if they don't have to. That is where the agenda of the useful idiots comes in. There are people out there in education, media and entertainment who believe capitalism and competition are bad, and that socialism and marxism will save them. And they are actively pushing their agenda on our youth. Their problem is that they need funding, and capitalists normally don't fund anti-capitalist agendas because doing so is typically counterproductive.

But that is not the case for the ultra rich; those who we would refer to as Elites. Elites exist in every form of government and economy. They are the ones at the top who hold all the power. The primary goal of the Elites is always to maintain their own power, which ensures that they and their families will never have to abide by the rules and conditions that the masses endure. Once one becomes an Elite, the form of government or economy in place does not matter as long as they are allowed to remain an Elite. And in fact, the less competitive the economy becomes, and the less upward mobility that is present, the better it actually is for the Elites. This is why the Elites would spend millions of dollars funding the spread of anti capitalism indoctrination in our youth. That funding is the equivolent of an insurance policy for the Elites.

An insurance policy? you ask. Yes. knowing that there are future Bill Gates out there, and that you have much to lose if their idea is superior to yours, your best option for winning the competition long term is to convince all possible future competitors that the competition itself is inherantly bad, and should be avoided. If you can get hundreds of millions of people to hate capitalism before they embrace its potential in their lives, you have greatly decreased your exposure to a competitor who could dethrone you. If you are Jeff Bezos, you do not care if everyone below you earns meager wages as long as they are all making their purchases through your website. But if just one person comes up with a better system and gets traction, you have trucks and giant distribution centers all over the country that would hang around your neck like a millstone and take you out. Similarly, Mark Zuckerberg remembers MySpace. He is the kid that took them down, so he needs to make sure no college kid comes along with the replacement for FaceBook.

Capitalism is the engine that drives human advancement. The ability to elevate ones own station in life simply by coming up with a better idea; an idea that benefits all of humanity, is at the very core of what it is to be free and to be an American. It is what drives so many people to leave their homeland and migrate to America; the persuit of a better life. Unfortunately there are far too many now in our country who are trying to change that out of ignorance, and are being funded by the uber-rich who are doing so out of pure selfishness. Now that they have won their battles, and are at the top of the mountain, they are so desperate to cling to their power and wealth, that they are willing to deprive all others of that opportunity to reach their potential. And even more sinister than that, they are willing to deprive all of humanity of the possible advancements that still lie ahead, dormant in the minds of this next generation. If they can keep those potential lions from ever entering the market, they can protect their wealth and power for themselves and their children, no matter what the overall effect is on humanity.

Stop believing their lies. If they really believed in socialism/marxism, they would give away all of their wealth and live like you and I. But we all know that is never going to happen.

Mostly Peaceful Protests

MOSTLY PEACEFUL PROTESTS COMPANY BIO Have you recently offended black voters and need to deflect their discontent? Are you trailing in the polls to your conservative opponent because of recent insensitive comments?  We can help.  We are Mostly Peaceful Protests.  Coordinating with our friends in the mainstream media and social media, we can stir up a diversion that can last anywhere from a few days of looting to an entire summer of civil unrest; whatever is necessary to take the heat off you and direct it at your opponent on the other side of the isle.  Remember Joe Biden’s famous “Then You Ain’t Black” gaffe.  We fixed that, and we can do the same for you. We partner with groups like BLM and Antifa to relieve business owners of their surplus inventory, as well as remodel their brick-and-mortar storefronts; often with the help of insurance claims.  And we are experts in logistics.  Need hundreds of identical protest signs that all look handmade?  Maybe you need a pallet of bricks strategically placed on a hard to access street corner, or you need to outfit your group with matching uniforms and armor.  We have you covered.  Does the problem of people having real jobs leave you with too few people to put on a real protest?  We can bus or fly in professional protestors to make your protest one for the ages.  We have the infrastructure in place to deliver supplies and coordinate troop movements so precisely that police agencies will be trapped behind shields and barriers for hours.  We are Mostly Peaceful Protests. MOSTLY PEACEFUL PROTESTS T-SHIRTS

Why Are We Using Gender Neutral Pronouns?

Disclaimer: I am a Mugwump, a politically homeless conservative. Generally speaking, I view the world through the lens of issues vs. partisanship. I am objective, unhappy with "Republicans" as a whole but will NEVER EVER play for other team, Democrats.

For years I avoided Twitter but recently jumped back into the Twitter-Sphere. One immediate observation is that my "leftish" friends/followers are using pronouns in their bio. I knew pronouns was a "thing" but did not thoroughly understand the depths at which gender neutral pronouns have gripped society.

So, I send messages, emails, and even pick up the phone and discuss pronouns with some of my "woke" friends attempting to make some sense of it. To be brutally honest, after 5-6 conversations I had not received an explanation that made much sense to me, or appeased my appetitive to understand why it's such a big "thing". Then, finally an in-person conversation and debate with a progressive friend helped me better understand the "pro" gender neutral position, that is not say it persuaded me at all to change my beliefs, but I now certainly understand the other side of the argument better. That conversation and debate will follow, shortly.

Next step, I jump into the rabbit holes of the internet attempting to make sense of it all. Finally, I find some content, articles, and information that help me better understand pronouns.

As someone that has worked in technology (software developer) and sales/marketing automation for 25 years, I found the linked article below to be helpful in explaining, from a marketing perspective, the intent of pronouns.


In my Neanderthal mind, which my leftish friends like to refer to, here is how I interpret and perceive pronouns, specifically gender neutral pronouns.

Since the beginning of time, mankind has always made the assumption that a person with male body parts is a male (he, him) and female body parts is female (her, she). This assumption according to some is wrong and does not consider a percentage of the population in which this assumption does not apply. The introduction of gender neutral pronouns is a cultural and societal means of which to be more inclusive for the percentage of the population in which traditional pronoun assignment does not apply.

Now that I better understand the raging debate of gender neutral pronouns, I find it a necessity to dig a little bit deeper, actually a LOTTA bit deeper. For me, there are two very serious issues/questions that need to be addressed in this conversation.

  • Freedom of Speech - At what point does social acceptance and "education" of gender neutral pronouns intrude on Freedom of Speech?
  • Violating Other People's Rights - Essentially, anything and everything that is ever said will NEVER be 100% received an noble or righteous, inevitably someone will be offended. Do you draw a line, if so where do you draw the line?

I will write more in the future about Freedom of Speech, Hate Speech, and Violating 3rd Party's Rights. For the remainder of this article, I would like to share a real in person debate I had with a friend, a very smart, educated, informed, and passionate progressive (i.e. a self-admitted borderline communist).

A Recent Debate - Conservative vs. Progressive Perspectives

I want to share an exchange and debate, an in-person debate over a cup of tea, with MAWA contributor Beauregard "Bo" Bolshevik about gender identity. Bo is an attorney who has practiced law for 30+ years so these are NOT easy debates, always mutually respectful but never easy.

The conversation was prompted in discussion about the male turned female swimmer Lia Thomas, who is now breaking collegiate records as a female swimmer although they (please note my proper use of gender neutral pronoun here) were born as a male.

I asked Bo; What % of people do you think are trans, or people that struggle with trans identity?

Bo answered 3%.

My response to Bo; the number is far less than 3%, I believe it's closer to 0.1% (1/1000).

The conversation dovetails into the mental and physical conditions that contribute to transgenderism and our conversation focuses specifically on Klinefelter Syndrome, where a biological male is born an extra X chromosome. People with Klinefelter Syndrome have an affinity for transgenderism, an affinity in this case meaning physical, mental, and emotional.

Next, we search for the what rate of males are born with this condition, depending on the study or data you cite the prevalence will fall between 1/500 - 1/700, which is between 0.14% and 0.2%.

For this conversation and debate, we only focused on male-to-female transgenderism. That said, it's a safe assumption, I believe, to assume a relative similar percentage of female-to-male transgenderism, mathematically speaking; IT'S NOT ADDITIVE, IT'S RELATIVE AND PROPORTIONAL.

So, now that we have some REAL numbers to launch a debate from, I ask the question.

Can we agree that people who have transgender tendencies is far closer to 0.1% than 3%, can we assume 0.5% for the sake of this conversation?

Bo agrees, for the sake of this debate and conversation we use 0.5%.

NOTE: Bo and I understand and agreed that there are many other conditions that contribute to transgenderism, therefore we agreed 0.14-0.2% is low, 0.5% was a number we could use as a baseline for the conversation. In the moment, we used 0.5-1% as an acceptable assumed range, even though I believe 1% is high, we both agreed 0.14% is low.

The next question we discuss;

Since the beginning of time, regardless of whether you are for creation or evolution, there have been males and females. Why are we re-engineering society, culture, and mankind to accommodate 0.5% of the population?

Bo's position; "Until recently, humans have never fully considered gender identity. Historically, they always considered gender to whatever the doctor says when a baby is born, 'Congratulations on your baby boy/girl.' What the doctor has done is assigned SEX but not GENDER."

My position; "It's a biological fact that when a baby is born with a penis, they are a boy. When a baby is born with a vagina, it's a girl. Without any physical health complications, that baby boy will grow up with the ability produce offspring as a contributing male, and the baby girl will grow up with the ability to produce offspring as a contributing female."

This is where the debate train derailed! From this point forward we could not find any common ground, once again our frequent conversations are ALWAYS mutually respectful. When Bo and I get to this point we simply agree to disagree.

For me, a Type A, left brained, common sense, issue oriented, conservative, I have to ask the rhetorical question; "Is the world SERIOUS about re-engineering societal norms, history, tradition, etc. for 0.5% of the population?" If ever there is an issue that could or should be extended as a plebiscite, this may be one of those issues. Myself, I would relent to a vote of the masses, a true plebiscite. If my American brothers and sisters voted that indeed gender neutral pronouns along with gender identity is a road we wish to travel, I would not like it but I would follow the law. Likewise, I would hope that people with opposing views would relent to a popular opinion. Is "majority rule" realistic? Unfortunately, not.

Bo and I are friends and do business together, we are mutually respectful, we are not policy makers, and we understand that when we reach a point in a heated debate we better stop because we do not want ideological differences to ruin a long enduring friendship. That said, both Bo's representation (progressives) and my representation (conservatives) have a job to do, and that is to resolve differences and create policy that best reflects the wishes of the American people and THAT IS NOT AN EASY JOB.

The End of the Pandemic: Dem Poll Numbers are Plummeting.

Many on the right have questioned the effectiveness off mask requirements and vaccine mandates. I was one of them. But now that the end of the pandemic has suddenly appeared, I must reconsider my stance. It appears that mask requirements and vaccine mandates did bring about the end of the pandemic; not because the scientific evidence supports them, but rather because these two items drove down the democrat polling numbers so low, that the Biden administration and the DNC had to change course immediately in a desperate attempt to save their party heading into the next election.     

We all know now, and probably most knew all along, if only in the back of their minds, that masks do not prevent the spread of Covid 19. Cotton masks have been nothing more than bite sized security blankets for NPR and MSNBC viewers, making them feel as though they have some control over a virus that can not be seen or controlled. The science has always shown that anything short of an N-95 mask is useless for preventing the spread of the virus.

But that has not stopped liberal politicians and their minions from requiring their use everywhere for nearly two years. They did however have their benefits. If accomplishing nothing more than helping intelligent people identify who you voted for, and what your mental state is, they also allowed NPR, MSNBC and CNN viewers to venture out into the world during these unstable times without having full on panic attacks.

We can also be quite certain that the politicians who mandated these face diapers, knew all along that they were ineffective, which is why so many of them were caught not wearing theirs. But the effectiveness that they were after was never the prevention of the spread of the virus, but rather the spread of complete panic. Much like instructing school children in the 60's and 70's to take safety under their desks in the event of a nuclear attack, these masks were an instrument for giving the ignorant a feeling of control over their destiny.

As you are reading this, you are asking the logical question: If they wanted to avoid complete panic, why didn't they just change the reporting and not oversell the fear? This is where the balancing act comes in. Democrats NEEDED widespread fear in order to manipulate the masses to win the 2020 election. You can't change voting procedures unless there is the possibility of death all around you. So they needed to keep everyone at DEFCON 1, but then they had to arm those same people with a weapon to defend themselves. And that weapon was the face mask.

I am by no means diminishing the seriousness of Covid-19. I have had more than my share of friends, family and associates get severely ill or die from it. So please do not take this writing as me making light of the virus. I am just shining light on the ludicrous manner in which it has been handled.

I am also not an anti-vaxxer. I had the vaccine, but not enthusiastically. I made a decision based on my health conditions, what I do for a living, and who I am around. But I strongly oppose vaccine mandates because I believe each person should be able to make their own decision whether or not they want the vaccine in their body or their child's body. It is unamerican to force people to do something to their body that they do not want to do.

In the end, both of these stances by the democrats, along with the destruction of our economy via their shutdowns, has led to enough unhappiness by the voting populous that they are now forced to change their direction or face the largest defeat ever seen in American politics this November. The democrats have been following the science all along. Unfortunately, that science has been political science, and as long as enough people were afraid and leaned left for protection, they were able to continue their stranglehold on America. Fortunately for us, that tide has turned. Their poll numbers are at all-time lows, and therefor, no matter what the Covid numbers are, they are declaring the Pandemic over. Stay Safe, and God Bless!

We are O-BLM – Our Black Lives Matter

We are O-BLM.  We are a quadrennially (sometimes biennially) active for-profit organization who receives the bulk of our income from woke corporations (and those trying to appear woke) during our active years.  We then use those accumulated riches to sustain our leadership team and partners during our dormant periods between election cycles because "Our Black Lives Matter."  Our black lives include our leadership team as well as white liberal politicians; all who benefit financially from the monetary donations of the previously mentioned corporations.

No one can argue against the three words "Black Lives Matter" because the statement "black lives matter" is absolutely true even if our organization represents a completely different mission.  This allows us to soften our image and gain support from people who agree with the statement 'black lives matter', but who would otherwise disagree with what we actually do and teach. Much like planned parenthood, whose actual mission is to PREVENT, not plan, PARENTHOOD, our focus is not on saving thousands of black lives a year, or on improving millions of black lives using time tested and proven solutions like education and the strengthening the nuclear family.  Rather, we use tragedies in the black community to anger black voters, shake down corporate donors, and then funnel that cash to radical liberal organizations and democrat political campaigns through our collection agency "Act Blue." In exchange for creating civil unrest, shaking down corporations, and shaming political opponents, we receive a portion of those donations; netting millions of dollars for our leadership team.  This has allowed us to each own multiple large scale homes in predominantly white neighborhoods where we can escape the violence and rot that our programs foster in black communities. Because OUR Black Lives matter MORE than yours.

During slavery, white democrats worked tirelessly to break down the black family unit by selling off family members, and making it illegal for slaves to learn to read and write, knowing that a stable and educated nuclear family was a serious threat to their power.  For the next hundred years, black people survived thanks to a tight knit culture comprised of church, the nuclear family and HBCU's.  In fact, for much of the first hundred years following the civil war, a higher percentage of black babies were born and raised in a two parent household than was seen for white babies.  It was these strong community and family bonds that allowed many black people to thrive in black communities and black business districts like Black Wall Street in America despite the horrific racism they faced under Jim Crow.

That all changed in the 60's.  We had to rebrand in order to wrestle control of the black vote from the republican party.  We quickly learned that government programs were the ticket to OUR prosperity. Our programs have driven down graduation rates, increased the percentage of black babies being born out of wedlock to over 75%, have increased the percentage of black people living in poverty, and have violent crime out of control in black neighborhoods. Breaking down black families and communities, and blaming the problems on our political opponents who do not govern them has been the perfect formula for our sustained success. Just imagine if we ever actually fixed the problems plaguing inner cities... they would no longer need us.  That is why we promise solutions that never materialize, and accuse our opponents of trying to take them away.  It is pure genius.

How did we do it? Today, we at OBLM promote the false concept of the nuclear family as well as math and other learning being racist in nature. By encouraging black people to make choices that are detrimental to their future success, we ensure their dependence on our government programs and their loyalty to liberal politicians during elections. We have even conditioned many black people to ignore the high numbers of violent crimes in the black community, particularly black on black violent crimes such as murder as racist dog whistles. Calling facts and statistics racist has been highly effective for us in getting people to ignore them.

Imagine if the majority of black citizens knew that less than a dozen unarmed black people a year are killed by police in a country of 350,000,000 people, or that they have a 10 times greater chance of being killed by a random falling object like like a tree branch of a hammer, than of being killed by police while committing a crime.  Or that they are 30 times more likely to die from falling out of a chair, or from falling down stairs than they are of being killed by police WHILE committing a crime. And these numbers are based on 'if you are committing a crime.' These numbers change exponentially for the rest of the black population. But that doesn't stop us from promoting the narrative that police are hunting innocent black people.

We can't even imagine what would happen to our movement and our funding if people understood that an innocent black person is more than 5,000 times more likely to be killed by another black person than they are of being killed by a police officer. Our money shot is video on social media or the mainstream media of one of the handful of unarmed black people being shot by police a year. And we use the misperception that seeing something covered extensively on social media is evidence that it is prevalent in society.  Even LeBron James has stated publicly that he fears for his life if he is pulled over by police, even though there has never been one famous black person killed by police; only people made famous by being shot or killed. 

The trick is that we sell the lie that it is an out of control problem happening every day.  Then we have our friends in the media play images over and over when they do happen, so it seems to be everywhere. And we set the bar at a level that is impossible to achieve; absolute perfection by police where zero people are ever killed. By setting this impossible standard, we ensure our own perpetual existence. These images are powerful, and move the average person to action based on their anger.  But if people knew that in contrast to the 3 dozen unarmed people of all races each year killed by police, there are over 300,000 innocent people killed by medical malpractice, most people would be commending police for their amazing job performance and throwing bricks at doctors and nurses. But again, we should not point that out and risk taking the focus off defunding the police, and further endangering the lives of people living in predominantly black communities because we need to keep our narrative going, so the money keeps flowing.  Because Our Black Lives Matter more than yours.


OPEC COMPANY BIO The Earth is our only home, and we must all do our part to protect its environment for generations to come.  We all know that drilling on American soil is extremely bad for the environment, and it must be stopped.  One only needs to watch the major news outlets or read an entertainer’s social media page to understand how close we are to peril.  It is with that common goal, that we at OPEC FULLY embrace America’s Green New Deal and the Biden Administration’s Build Back Better plans, and will do whatever we can to ensure their complete (word for installation).  to cut domestic oil production by restricting drilling on American Soil and blocking the construction of the Keystone Pipeline.  Studies from Brooklyn CC and over a dozen Universities in OPEC Nations, have found conclusive evidence that oil produced in the Middle East, South America and Russia, then transported it via fossil fuel powered ships across oceans, produces 75% less carbon emissions than drilling on American Soil and transporting it via domestic pipelines.  Other Studies have concluded that Russian Pipelines are 300% safer than American Pipelines because they are controlled by oligarchs without the interference of U.S. government regulators such as the Environmental Protection Agency, and therefore should receive worldwide support.  OPEC oil may be more costly, and reduce your national security, but we all need to do our part because Drilling on American Soil is BAD for the Environment.  OPEC T-SHIRTS

Epstein Island Travel

EPSTEIN ISLAND TRAVEL COMPANY BIO Everyone loves Beautiful Island Getaways, and many of us who have achieved success feel a need to give back and help the next generation.  Epstein Island Travel has a mission like no other.  We foster mentoring programs where we connect at risk youth with people of great power and influence, and we do it in one of the most beautiful island resorts you will ever experience.  Our people of influence work with our youth in private one on one settings, or sometimes in groups, to teach the next generation what power and money can provide.   Our youth are recruited by experts and flown via private jet to our island oasis.  We would love to share our list of VIPs, but these wonderful people prefer, out of humble servitude, to remain anonymous; making our private list something to die for.  Epstein Island Travel:  Bringing people together. EPSTEIN ISLAND TRAVEL T-SHIRTS